Built because the other journals don't add up.

Every trading journal claims to track your performance. Few of them actually get the numbers right. Closed multi-leg positions get logged as still open. Commission and swap get dropped from one leg of a round trip. Drawdown gets calculated against the wrong baseline. None of this shows up until you're staring at a stat that doesn't match what your broker statement says — and by then you've already made decisions based on it.

TradeNhance exists to fix that. We built it around one rule: if a number is on the screen, it has to be right, traced back to an actual trade, not smoothed over or estimated. That same standard carries through everything else we've added since — prop firm rule tracking that simulates your account day by day instead of guessing, a Monte Carlo calculator that uses your real win rate instead of a generic assumption, and broker imports that flag what they can't confidently parse instead of silently getting it wrong.

We're a small team building this for traders who'd rather see an honest, slightly less impressive number than a flattering, wrong one. If that's how you think about your own trading, you're in the right place.